Category Energy

Who killed the pipeline? Republicans or Obama?

If you have listened to the news on the Keystone XL Pipeline today you might be thinking that the Republicans are responsible for killing the pipeline – you would be wrong. After hearing these reports I decided to read Obama’s official statement on his rejection of the Keystone XL Pipeline. He suggested that Republicans ‘forced’ his hand by setting an arbitrary 60-day deadline for a decision. When I heard the explanation on NPR this morning the president’s position seemed reasonable and appropriate. Those crazy Republicans wanted to force him to make a decision before he had enough time to study the impact of the pipeline – they only gave him two months. Wow. So I decided to do a little research of my own. Turns out the truth is very different from what either Obama or NPR wants us to believe. Obama has been delaying a decision for political reasons since entering office in 2008 – more than three years…

The Keystone XL was proposed in 2008 and was approved by the National Energy Board in 2010.  Obama and NPR’s assertion that Republicans are ‘rushing’ him is completely BS. His administration has had three years to study the impact of the pipeline. The Republican’s 60 day deadline for a decision was in direct response to Obama’s announcement in November that he was going to delay a decision on the pipeline until November 2013 – just days after the presidential election. Obama wasn’t rushed – he was forced to admit what he was planning all along – to reject the pipeline. The only way we get the pipeline is to get a new President, period.

Obama claims that he is concerned about the pipeline’s route through the environmentally sensitive Sandhills in Nebraska. What he doesn’t tell you is that Keystone worked extensively with the US Department of State and came up with 14 (yes 14) different routes including one route that avoided the Sandhills entirely. In November the Governor of Nebraska signed to compromise bills with the pipeline builder to move the route out of the Sandhills.

At the end of the day Obama is against the pipeline. Had it not been for the Republicans forcing him to reveal his decision the American people wouldn’t have known about his decision until after he was reelected. Will this information make a difference? I hope so. Energy independence is VERY important for America. Sending our money to the Middle East is simply a bad idea. Depending on the Middle East for our oil is a VERY bad idea. Today we produce around 60% of our own oil and with the pipeline the Americas could produce more than 2/3rds of our oil – within a decade we could produce 100%.

Energy

Newt Gingrich said it best,

“We must lead the world in environmental stewardship.  To do this we must implement a “green conservatism” that uses America’s strengths – free markets, incentives, economic growth, technological achievement and entrepreneurship – to create a cleaner environment and great prosperity for the world.”

I couldn’t agree more.  We as conservatives get so caught up with the facts around global warming and CO2 we never get to the heart of the matter – making America ‘greener’ is a worthy goal. I would argue that it doesn’t really matter whether or not CO2 emissions are warming our planet.  Many former global warming proponents, in the face of 10 year cooling cycle, have changed their tune suggesting CO2 emissions are creating global climate change.  But, again, I don’t think it matters.  My point is that the stuff that creates CO2 (oil, natural gas and coal) is getting more and more expensive and it is just plain dirty.   Wouldn’t it make sense to take drastic and immediate action to replace as much fossil fuel demand as possible by building non-CO2 emitting power generation technology that is fully capable of creating massive amounts of energy today (no further study needed).  No, I am not talking about magic; I am talking about nuclear energy.

I feel like a guy alone in the wilderness, the answer is so obvious, we need a Roosevelt-style program of massive public works creation of nuclear power plants.  Talk about a stimulus program (yea, my kids will be paying for it, but at least they will get the benefit).  Obama and many Republicans aren’t interested in nuclear energy, they wants to burn more coal (they calls it clean coal, I don’t care if you call it ‘magic coal’ it still generates 40% of the CO2 emissions we generate as a country).

  • Repeal laws that prevent a single, interchangeable nuclear power plant design (using the 3rd generation technology designed by US firm Westinghouse – being deployed in China today)
  • Fast track approval of nuclear reactors throughout the United States (our goal should be to start 10 reactors per year for the next 10 years).
  • Repeal all coal subsidies and begin conversion of appropriate coal plants to use natural gas (this can take as little as six months and cost about $20 per ton of carbon saved – cash for clunkers cost $1700 per ton of carbon).
  • Provide a level playing field for wind and solar power generation by a) eliminating oil and gas subsidies or b) providing equal subsidies for wind and solar.
  • Allow drilling for oil and natural gas in all 50 states and off of our shores (highly regulated so as to limit the impact to nature).
  • Fund research in the development of a next generation of battery that will allow automakers to build electric cars that can tap into the new zero-CO2 nuclear power grid that will be coming online in the next decade.

The current Cap and Tax bill Congress is considering does nothing to a) reduce CO2, b) make the environment greener, c) increase our energy independence. Newt Gingrich has some interesting facts about what the bill will cost us:

Estimates are that the Waxman-Markey bill will raise electricity prices by an astounding 90 percent. It will raise gasoline prices by 74 percent. It will raise the average American family’s energy bill by $1,500 each year. And, far from creating jobs, experts predict that the global warming bill will destroy 1,105,000 jobs on average each year, with peak years seeing unemployment rise by over 2,479,000 jobs. All in all, the bill is expected to reduce our gross domestic production (GDP) by $9.6 trillion. And for what?

Seo 1 plugin by abhbass.com